In Amara, the destruction was avoided, in Medhat Pasha renovation is underway – but in Saroujah, the argument goes on. Official documents show a decision is going to be made by the end of the year – a generation after the controversy began.
Saroujah holds a special place in my heart. I named my blog after the area – it is MY Damascus. And I get incredibly defensive when it is threatened. But Saroujah is defined by the threat of destruction. For thirty years, plans to destroy Saroujah – not renovate it – have hung over this area.
Saroujah is an odd case. It is just outside the city walls (you can see the Umayid Mosque in the background – below), but because it is hundreds of years old, it comes under the remit of the Old City renovation authorities.
Souq Saroujah – the Saddlemakers’ Market – is concentrated around one thin road of the same name. The Mosque (below) and Hamam (the dome in the picture above) are at the centre of the community.
But not many people live in Saroujah any more. Thirty years ago, the Damascus authorities started evicting residents, to build ugly modern tower blocks for the booming population.
Work to get rid of the old houses, and put up tower blocks, started in the south-west corner of Saroujah. But this modern corner of Saroujah isn’t all bad – the pure-white French Cultural Centre (the CCF) is a work of art. It was designed by French architect José Oubrerie in the 1980s, and looks as fresh today as it did two decades ago.
The remaining residents knew their houses would be next. But as suddenly as the work started, it stopped again. Many old Saroujans are some of the city’s richest people. And with wealth comes power. They weren’t going to let their area fall victim to modernisation. A temporary halt was placed on the demolition.
But with the threat of eviction hanging over them, no-one was going to waste money repairing a house which could be seized. So they let their houses fall into disrepair.
And gradually they moved out – ironically, many went to the modern European-style flats in the neighbouring Ayn Kirsh, just to the north of Saroujah.
But recently, the organisation which looks after the Old City – and works well with the European Union to do it – has taken over responsibility for Saroujah. So is a change in Saroujah’s fortunes in store?
In the past few months, they have re-paved part of the area (with far less inconvenience than in Medhat Pasha).
So does this mean destruction is no longer on the cards?
Documents released by the Old City modernisation authorities show that they are going to make a decision on the future of Saroujah by the end of this year.
They are already looking into the legality of the ‘evictions’, which are still officially ‘on hold’. Hopefully they will say that there is no legal basis to the idea.
It is the Old City authorities – not the Muhafaza (Damascus City Council) – which is responsible for Saroujah now. They have a very different set of priorities – renovation and protection – not destruction and modernisation.
So hopefully, the news at the end of the year will be good. For Saroujah’s sake.